The simple answer to this question is yes but it’s not what you think. According to the most recent reports from both the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) and Mental Health America the rate of serious mental illness in both adults and teens is rising. In 2024, mental illness was experienced by 23.4% of adults and 16.5% of youth aged 6-17. Serious mental illness was experienced by 5.6% of adults. The disorders reported with the highest frequency in adults were anxiety disorders (19.1%), major depressive disorders (15.5%), and co-occurring substance use disorders and mental illness (8.1%). (Reinert, Nguyen, & Fritze, 2025; National Alliance on Mental Illness, n.d.) How do these numbers compare with medical conditions? Nearly 50% of Americans have high blood pressure which if untreated is a precursor to disability and death. (Essa et al., 2025; Wadhera et al., 2026) The rate of diabetes in Americans is 14% and the rate of obesity is greater than 40%. (Wadhera et al., 2026)
It is extremely difficult to accurately interpret the rates of mental illness for a variety of reasons. Much of the data comes from the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) National Survey on Drug Use and Health. (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2025). Surveys can have significant limitations. While the SAMHSA survey produces a large sample size allowing statistical modeling to increase representation of the general population there are still many confounding factors. Participants self-select. The survey is made available to a large number of individuals but those who choose to participate want to make time to complete this survey, that is close to 800 pages and share very personal information about their use of substances and their mental health. Some participants may also be invited to complete an interview. Many of those invited to participate are not interested. This may result in some bias in the sample. Self-reporting is not always accurate and certainly not the same as gathering data from medical records. This questionnaire asks many screening questions related to diagnostic criteria for specific mental illness diagnoses. Screening tools are just that. By themselves they are not diagnostic and require further evaluation in the form of an interview by a trained mental health professional in order to make a diagnosis. When a person reports experiencing “serious mental illness” in the past year, what does that mean? Does it require having a specific diagnosis, was the diagnosis made by a qualified mental health professional, and was the diagnosis accurate? Or is this a self-report of what a person thinks they may have based on their own research? From the perspective of how the symptoms affect a person’s life, it doesn’t matter, because their life experience is valid. However, when it comes to understanding the symptoms, what may be causing them, what to call them, and treatment interventions, it may make a significant difference.
Another limitation of the SAMHSA survey is that it does not collect information from people who are homeless (not living in a shelter), on active military duty, or confined to an institution (jails, prisons, hospitals). Significant mental illness and substance use disorders are over-represented in the institutionalized and homeless populations, making the survey data even more difficult to interpret.
It is very challenging to determine whether there has been a significant increase over the last decade in the diagnoses of major mental illnesses like major depression, anxiety disorders, bipolar disorder, or psychotic disorders like schizophrenia for the same reasons the survey data are difficult to interpret. I have worked in the mental health field for over 40 years and while I do see increases in these diagnoses over time, they are not large. As we improve our knowledge and diagnostic capabilities and more individuals have access to mental health care it would be normal to see some increase in these diagnoses over time. If diagnoses of major mental disorders are relatively stable, why do many believe there is a major mental health crisis in the United States? There is, we are just looking in the wrong place.
X—–crisis—- -X
| Mental Illness Mental Wellness Optimal Mental Health |
Like physical health, mental health is on a spectrum. It is not static, but very fluid. Those with diagnoses of serious mental illness will be located somewhere to the left of mental wellness and when their symptoms interfere significantly in daily life, they will be at the far left. Optimal mental health, at the far right, is a place of awe, when there is a temporary reprieve from life stressors and everything is going right. Generally, striving for mental wellness in the middle is a good goal.
We tend to pay far more attention to medical rather than mental illness. There has been tremendous stigma surrounding mental illness and while we have made progress there is still much work to be done. It is important to remember that our physical health affects our mental health and our mental health affects our physical health. Our brains live in our bodies so what affects one also affects the other. Things we do to improve physical health will generally also improve mental health and vice versa. Things as simple as sleep schedule, diet, exercise, and making space for enjoyable activities can have a profound impact on our health if they become dysregulated or are absent.
When most people think about a mental health crisis in the United States, they tend to focus on the far left of the scale where serious mental illness lives. However, the current crisis actually occupies the space between mental illness and mental wellness regardless of whether an individual has a mental health diagnosis.
I am not discounting significant mental illness or it’s treatment, but the real crisis is more about lack of general mental health self-care and adaptive coping skills. There are non-pharmaceutical interventions with decades of research support, that improve and promote mental wellness including regular exercise, yoga, mindfulness meditation, spending time in nature, and using music and art as therapy. There are also a number of approaches to therapy that can be very helpful including Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), and Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) for trauma work, just to name a few. In the current climate of pharmaceutical domination, these interventions are being discarded in favor of accumulating multiple mental illness diagnoses and polypharmacy. Many of these medications have serious and sometimes irreversible side effects and questionable efficacy.
I am not against the use of psychotropic medications. I prescribe them in my clinical practice. They can be very beneficial and in some cases lifesaving. However, in most cases medication alone is never an effective management strategy. Let us take a look at an example. A teen or adult is struggling with significant anxiety about how others perceive them and is bombarded by negative intrusive thoughts and self-talk that interfere in multiple areas of their life. At school or work they are sure others view them negatively making it difficult to engage with classmates, teachers, or coworkers and interfering with performance of tasks. When they get home after school or work, they spend time mentally reviewing each interaction of the day in excruciating detail, being especially critical of what they did or said and interpreting all responses negatively. Their only friends are people they met online and have never met in person. They have a small group of online friends who also struggle socially and as a group they spend time discussing how mean other people are. They also spend hours on social media, doom scrolling other people’s accounts, comparing their life to their perception of others based on the content posted. They may try to quiet their anxiety with food, alcohol, or other substances. They sleep poorly due to intrusive and racing negative thoughts and disturbing dreams and they have chronic thoughts they would be better off dead although no motivation to act on these thoughts. They also experience headaches and stomach aches, especially in the morning before leaving for school or work and if they need to interact with others at social events. This can result in missing days of school or work and declining invitations to social events.
The teen or adult is seen by a mental health provider and diagnosed with an anxiety disorder. They are started on a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) such as Prozac, Zoloft, or Lexapro. These psychotropic medications are the first line treatment for anxiety and depressive disorders. How long will it take for medication to work and what level of relief will they receive? SSRIs can take up to several months to begin providing significant symptom relief. Research indicates about 60% of people who take an SSRI have a response, meaning they notice 50% improvement in symptoms and only 40% achieve remission. There is also concern about a modest placebo effect confounding the evaluation of efficacy. (Furmark et al., 2025; Belanger et al., 2023) If the teen or adult has a response to medication will it completely eliminate anxiety, negative intrusive thoughts, physical symptoms, improve sleep, decrease substance use, and improve confidence in social situations? The honest answer is no.
An SSRI may decrease their overall level of anxiety and physical symptoms and slow down negative thoughts but it will not make them go away. These modest improvements may provide some relief but most likely will not have an effect on behaviors used to cope with anxiety. Ruminating on negative thoughts, isolation, doom scrolling, and use of food and substances to manage anxiety are all maladaptive behaviors that have been used long term and reinforced on some level. Without intense work in therapy, they are likely to continue. The work of therapy in this case is to examine these behaviors and how they affect the teen or adult, prioritize where to start, and begin by learning some new coping skills that are more adaptive, before trying to reduce and eliminate some of these behaviors. The teen or adult can learn to challenge negative thoughts and use distraction techniques to prevent rumination. They can find ways to gradually expand their social circle to reduce isolation. They can replace doom scrolling, overeating, and substance use with more adaptive coping skills. It is not easy work and it requires examining things about oneself that are often painful. It also takes time and motivation but, in the end, these are skills that will decrease anxiety and improve all areas of daily life, helping the individual learn how to help themselves.
What led to this dearth of adaptive coping skills in America? Some of it is related to changes in the pace and stress of life and how this has affected family structure and function. And some of it is related to the growth of the internet, social media, AI and access to these. Yes, I am going to play that card and I will explain why in a moment.
A brief review of traditional child development tells us that until a child goes to school their world is shaped primarily by parents, caregivers, and other significant adults in their life. Their behavior and coping skills are developed by seeking attention and love from these caregivers and observing how these important people manage their own stress. Once children begin school, they have the additional influence of teachers, peers, and friends. In adolescence friends generally become much more important and influential than parents. The teen years are a time when personality, ethical and moral decision making, and personal values are all beginning to coalesce.
Think back to the time before computers, cell phones, and the internet were widely available in the United States (late 1990’s). When children were at home, they were not on their phone or other electronic device, so what were they doing? Talking with parents or caregivers, helping with chores, playing board/card games, coloring, completing puzzles, reading, playing with siblings, neighborhood kids, or friends, spending time outside in nature, and perhaps watching something on TV, keeping in mind how limited programming was at that time.
Teenagers were interested in maximizing time with friends. Since they could not connect on-line they either needed to use the family phone plugged into the wall before cordless models, so privacy was sometimes difficult to achieve or get together in person. They may have decided to participate in after school activities as a way to spend additional time with friends doing something enjoyable. But mostly, they had to find ways to spend time in person. Their exposure to information came from parents, teachers, friends, maybe the library, and the TV. It took longer for news to make it to the public, it was much more heavily censored than it is now, there was still some semblance of journalistic integrity, and it was not available 24 hours a day. This time spent in person helped with the development of adaptive and productive social skills as well as providing excellent social support. Engagement in a variety of activities also provided exposure to adaptive coping skills that could serve as a foundation for managing life stress into adulthood.
If we fast forward to today, much of our communication does not take place in person. People do not write in complete sentences anymore and use many slang terms and abbreviations. No context is provided by visual cues like facial expressions, body language, and gestures. This leads to misunderstanding and uncertainty. People who are isolated often lose social skills that can create anxiety when they need to spend time around others. Communicating electronically also leads to immediate responses without thinking through potential consequences, which can produce awkward and destructive outcomes. These all contribute to tears in the fabric of society and a breakdown of effective communication.
In addition to the breakdown of social skills and communication the internet and social media access have exposed us to a tremendous amount of misinformation. A disturbing trend was developing pre-Covid in the tween and teen population. There was a dramatic increase in the glorification of mental illness on social media leading to the trend of diagnosis by social media. During Covid, this population was extremely isolated, and because they could not do much else, screen time soared. This combination seemed to increase the development of identity centered on mental illness, formation of on-line communities promoting these illnesses, and it dominated friend groups, often in a competitive nature to see whose symptoms were worse and who had the most diagnoses. It is disturbing to think that this population felt so disconnected the only way they could find validation was through identification as mentally ill.
Much of the mental illness information available on social media focused on symptom profiles which was problematic. There is tremendous overlap of symptoms in a variety of mental illness diagnoses as well as normal responses to life events. When things do not go as planned or desired, when we suffer a loss, or when we experience a traumatic event, we will have symptoms that can affect every aspect of our life and may last months. These are normal responses to life events and do not necessarily indicate mental illness. Perpetual happiness is a myth; it just does not exist. The more people strive to achieve this the more unhappy they become. Focusing on moments and mindful appreciation of interactions, events, and feelings throughout the day provides much more life satisfaction than striving for eternal happiness. Learning to validate our experiences and feelings, sit with distress, gather support, and use adaptive coping skills will sustain us through these difficulty life events. Rarely can a pill match that.
Much of what is on social media and the internet is inaccurate at best and with the addition of AI it is getting worse. It is very challenging for people to distinguish fact from fiction. It is fine to do your own research, but then it is important to see a qualified health care provider to discuss your concerns, get accurate information, and make decisions about treatment that is right for you.
So how do we go from this?

Photo by Kathy Kroening. Lake Chelan, WA. November 2022
To this?

Photo by Kathy Kroening. Lake Chelan, WA. November 2022
If our aim is to improve the mental health of Americans, we have much work to do. We need to increase access to accurate information about mental health and wellbeing, especially for tweens and teens. Government funding for providing this curriculum in our school systems, starting in elementary school would be ideal. We also need to improve access to mental health care in the United States. Depending on the source, up to 10% of the American population has no health insurance. For those with insurance, depending on their coverage, they may have access to mental health care but not be able to afford it. Access is also affected by lack of providers. Mental health professionals are burned out and leaving the field and there are fewer individuals pursuing it as a career. Lack of mental health providers in rural areas in particular is a major barrier to accessing services. The bottom line is our government needs to take the lead and make changes that demonstrate they prioritize the health and mental health of all Americans. Without this declaration and actions to back it up, we will most likely continue to see decline.
On a personal level, each individual can focus on maximizing their own mental health and sharing what works for them with family and friends. In this way we can start a ripple that will hopefully gain momentum and spread to others. It is a humble start but you never know where it might lead.
Until next time stay safe, be well, be kind to yourself, support each other, and spread the love.

Photo by Kathy Kroening. Seattle, WA. May 2025
References:
Belanger, H, Lee, C, Poliacoff, Z, Gupta, C, & Winsberg, M. (2023). Early Response to Antidepressant Medications in Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: A Naturalistic Study and Odds of Remission at 14 Weeks. Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 43(1): 46–54. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9803387/
Essa, M., Malik, D., Lu, Y., Yang, H., Spatz, E., Krumholz, H., & Faridi, K. (2025). Hypertension Prevalence, Awareness, and Control in US Adults Before and After the COVID-19 Pandemic. Journal of Clinical Hypertension (Greenwich), 27(7). https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12277530/
Furmark T, Wahlstedt K, and Faria V (2025) Revisiting the SSRI vs. Placebo Debate in the Treatment of Social Anxiety Disorder: the Role of Expectancy Effects, Neural Responsivity, and Monoamine Transporters. Frontiers in Psychology. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12104218/
Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 87(9). https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2025.12.027#abstract
National Alliance on Mental Illness (n.d.). Mental Health by the Numbers. NAMI. https://www.nami.org/mental-health-by-the-numbers/
Reinert, M, Nguyen, T & Fritze, D. (October 2025). “The State of Mental Health in America 2025.” Mental Health America, Alexandria VA. https://mhanational.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/State-of-Mental-Health-2025.pdf
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2025). Key substance use and mental health indicators in the United States: Results from the 2024 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (HHS Publication No. PEP25-07-007, NSDUH Series H-60). Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. https://www.samhsa.gov/data/data-we-collect/nsduh-national-surveydrug-use-and-health/national-releases
Wadhera, R., Dhruva, S., Bikdeli, B., Bonaca, M., Kittleson, M., Ko, D., Lu, Y., Pagidipati, N., Sawano, M., Spatz, E., Vaduganathan, M., Wasfy, J. Young, C., Yang, H. Zheng, Z., Krumholz, H., & Curtis, L. (2026). Cardiovascular Statistics in the United States, 2026: JACC Stats.
































